Get Social

Toolbox on Twitter

Find us on

Follow postgradtoolbox on Twitter Follow Postgraduate Toolbox on Facebook


Sign up to our FREE eNewsletter

Sign up now for the Postgraduate Toolbox fornightly eNewsletter, the ultimate companion to your postgraduate life.

Enter your email here to subscribe.



Banner2

Cps_logo_final2b

Enx5_banner

Minitab_corporate_r__120x49

Linguaphone



Gavin_hadland

Gif1

Pglife_thumb Career_thumb Enterprise_thumb

Advice Forums > Forum: Postgraduate Life >


Managing Literature

New_reply

Pia LEE-WILSON

Member since: June Jun, 2008
5 posts

Pia LEE-WILSON wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Hi Bart,
I use Endnote to both archive and reference. It's fairly easy to get used to and manage. If your university has a CHEST licence you can buy your own own copy for about £60 - £70.
You can get more infromation at http://www.adeptscience.co.uk/a4e/search/5/6/EndNote+(CHEST+Licence).html
Pia


James Moore

Member since: May May, 2008
3 posts

James Moore wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Hi Bart,

An alternative to Endnote, is Refworks. I'm not sure how it compares price wise but the particular advantage is that everything is held by the software company on secure remote servers and access over the internet.

This has two advantages (1) You don't have to worry about your computer dying or making three million backups of everything! (2) Because it is online you can access your bibliographic data anywhere that has a decent internet link

Bart

Member since: July Jul, 2008
2 posts

Bart wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Thanks for the advice!

I'll check them out.

Krista Kateneva

Member since: September Sep, 2008
3 posts

Krista Kateneva wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

A *free* alternative to both EnsNote and RefWorks is Zotero. Zotero has pretty much all the functions the other two have (eg: grabbing info online, storing it either online or in your computer, attaching files/tags/comments to your citations, inserting and formating your citations and bibliography directly in your MS Word or Open Office document, etc). And the best part, for poor grad students, of course, is that it is a free initiative. Seems to have very solid sponsors backing it too.

Lillian Jessie Jones-Bell

Member since: September Sep, 2008
2 posts

Lillian Jessie Jones-Bell wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Refworks may be a free service through your learning institutions library. It is a free service for registerd students at SJSU through our school library portal. Also you can use a web based product such as delicious bookmarks which is free. You can access all you saved websites and articles from any computer as it is a web based product. Also has some search features as well.

Dallas Knight

Member since: September Sep, 2008
2 posts

Dallas Knight wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Hi Bart
Connotea and CiteULike are two others. Both are free and can be added to the Firefox toolbar.
http://www.connotea.org/
Free online reference management for all researchers, clinicians and scientists
http://www.citeulike.org/
A free online service to organise references to academic papers of interest and share them with others. Sponsored by a publishing company.

Laura Ramil

Member since: November Nov, 2008
1 posts

Laura Ramil wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

You can also use refworks but it gets a bit complicated sometimes...

James Pilgrim

Member since: May May, 2008
1 posts

James Pilgrim wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

If you are planning on using latex at any point in your phd write up, you could try JabRef which works on the principle of the BiBTeX file. This means you can have the same bibtex file to generate the references in your document as you use to organise all your files. Have a look at http://jabref.sourceforge.net/

Bart

Member since: July Jul, 2008
2 posts

Bart wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Does anyone know any good tools to manage my ever-growing collection of literature?

At the moment I'm just putting the .pdf files in folders. However I anticipate that this way of archiving will not work in the long run.

I imagine a program with a good search function, maybe with tags?

What do you use?

Candice Kay Lee

Member since: July Jul, 2008
5 posts

Candice Kay Lee wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I have tried several of these tools but in the end relied on my own manual method for organization and filing. It would be great to hear personal success stories from other Graduate Junction users about best manual methods/style of organization for managing literature. Also, I was never reluctant to use online tools for this task, simply, I never really found the right tool that worked for me! This is largely because there isn't much out there on the market to choose from. We will try to keep you updated on the latest tools as and when they appear.

Simon Quattlebaum

Member since: June Jun, 2008
8 posts

Simon Quattlebaum wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Managing literature was a challenge for me as began my research. However, the key is to begin to think about your research before getting the research together. Having said that, like someone mentioned in another post, using various software to organize notes and references could get to be a bot overwhelming. Just one more piece to a puzzle that makes things that much more challenging. In my case, it seems to have lengthened the process of getting the dissertaion completed. It's costly (money and emotionally) and simply takes too much time.

So, what I use to store what notes, comments, bibliographies, references, etc., is Onenote from Micro$oft. It uses a tabbed interface, merges seamlessly with M$ Word, Excel, Outlook (if use it), and it appears to be more user friendly. As someone whose never written at this magnitude on this level, all I need is for another software program to get in the way, so to speak. Technology is great. But when its a hindrance or adds extra work, it's something I don't need to add to my thought process. Old fashion note taking is still the great way to go!

Wendy

Member since: September Sep, 2009
1 posts

Wendy wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I think you guys should look at Mendeley. This is a free software for managing your literatures. Have a look! I also just wanted to start with this.

Esther Dingley

Member since: April Apr, 2008
21 posts

Esther Dingley wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I am researching what off- and on-line referencing tools early-career researchers are (discovering and) using. I am trying to identify different opportunities so this thread has been a great help. If there are other tools that people are aware of, please share this with the community.

I am also trying to assess the usuage of some of the newer online tools and the disadvantages and advantages people have experienced. Please share your experiences. Any thoughts and comments would be great not only for this research project but for others in the community.

I personally used EndNote for my dissertation as this was already installed on my computer when I got it. I therefore didn’t really shop around at the time or evaluate the advantages or disadvantages of other opportunities. As it was also installed I didn’t think about the cost. I found it very intuitive to use but did find it a problem when I went to the university computing room or library and used other computers as I could obviously not access my library.

I have also heard a lot about Zotero (open source). I have so far read some very positive reviews on Zotero but that the only constraint being that because it is open source it needs to be run in Firefox. I would really love to hear from anyone who has/is actually using it. I am considering trying it out for this current project. Actually, exciting the key lead on the Zotero project, Dan Cohen of George Mason University, is actually coming to give the second Arcadia Lecture in Cambridge in April so I hope to have suitable questions ready....so if anyone has any specific feedback about Zotero I'd also be very interested to hear about this too.

Liz Thackray

Member since: July Jul, 2009
1 posts

Liz Thackray wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I had a look at a number of tools including RefWorks, Zotera, and BookEnds before deciding to use EndNote. I keep a copy of my EndNote files in my dropbox so that I always have access as long as the computer I am using has EndNote installed.

I like EndNote for the simplicity of importing citations and being able to keep a copy of relevant pdf and any other notes I make with the citation information. The smart groups feature is brilliant for organising stuff.

For reading on the go, I have copies of the pdfs on Papers (OK it is a storage overhead) but I find this is a useful second tool but less easy to keep synched across different machines.

Recently I have heard good stuff about Mendeley and may take a look.

Phil Weber

Member since: January Jan, 2010
1 posts

Phil Weber wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Unison (Google "Unison File Synch") is a good, free tool for keeping folders in synch between computers. I use it to keep synchronised between PC at home, a USB key, and at uni. I currently keep quite a large number of PDFs organised into a folder structure, plus notes and data in other structures. Experimented with Zotero, but don't find myself using it that often. Also have just started looking at "swish-e" (free) which can create index files, including PDFs, I believe on Linux and Windows, but seems to require a bit of effort and technical know-how ... there do seem to be other free alternatives which may be simpler to get going. I can see such a tool becoming useful as my document and research collection grows.

Andy Coverdale

Member since: March Mar, 2009
1 posts

Andy Coverdale wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I use Zotero (http://www.zotero.org/) on Firefox, but Mendeley (http://www.mendeley.com/) is also worth looking into.

It's a documentation and reference management desktop tool (Windows, Mac and Linux) which can be synchronised with Mendeley Web to provide social networking with other researchers.

Both Zotero and Mendeley also provide citation support in Microsoft Word and OpenOffice.

There is also Sente (http://www.thirdstreetsoftware.com) (Mac only) but I'm not too familiar with this.

Esther Dingley

Member since: April Apr, 2008
21 posts

Esther Dingley wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Thanks everyone for continuing to update my search for different online referencing tools. Checked out all the tools listed here.

So far my preference lies with Zotero. I very much like the fact that it is an Open Source project rather than some of the other commercially-driven sites. It is very intuitive and has good integration features and allows you to easily store, organise, cite any source of information. You can also automatically synchronise the work you have done locally with your research materials between multiple computers. Would definitely recommend people checking out this particular tool.

Alistair Brown

Member since: May May, 2008
10 posts

Alistair Brown wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I reviewed some referencing software about 5 years ago now (http://www.thepequod.org.uk/essays/reviews/biblio.htm), when just starting out on my PhD. I settled on Refworks back then, but have since switched to Endnote X2, since it seems to be better at incorporating digital files (e.g. PDFs) along with references. I guess the seamless move from offline software to online resources and "cloud" hosted references is really important. Will have to check out Zotero on that note.

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote at 09:52 on 27 May 2010

I just found out that EndNote has an online tool called EndNoteWeb. I haven't used it myself but the idea of using a relatively familiar software to access references online does appeal to me.

Has anybody got any experience of EndNoteWeb?

Matthew Trump

Member since: May May, 2010
4 posts

Matthew Trump wrote at 19:10 on 29 May 2010

Esther,

You can integrate Zotero's database within Mendeley Desktop.

Matthew

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote at 20:46 on 31 May 2010

Hi Matthew,

I have always been a little dubious about throwing myself into using Mendeley as I really like the Open Source movement and I feel like using something with a coding and support 'community' means it is likely to be more sustainable in the future. So that point I agree with Esther. I've also heard rumours and read a couple of blog posts about some copyright issues with Mendeley that they are getting into trouble with.....

I prefer Zotero because of the open source aspect and also the credibility that it has being attached to a University, with a big grant behind it. I would always use an open source software if it is comparable quality to the commercial options (Mendeley, EndNote, RefWorks etc). Zotero meets my needs and is comparable if not better than other options.

Jimme Jardine

Member since: August Aug, 2010
2 posts

Jimme Jardine wrote at 21:38 on 21 August 2010

Hi everyone,

While studying towards my PhD in Computational Linguistics I started writing Qiqqa to help me not only collect PDFs and manage my references (using both BibTeX for my 1st year report, conference papers and eventual write-up and MS Word for quick jottings of ideas to my supervisor), but also to help me organise everything I have read over the time of my PhD. Now when I read a paper I mark all the areas of the PDF that I think are important and I can see them all summarised in a single report when I need to recap them.

After several people in my lab asked if they could use it too, I decided to polish it a little and turn it into something free for everyone.

I have also thrown in:
1) syncing my PDF collection between the lab, home and the web for my laptop and iPhone.
2) full index search of the PDFs (even the scanned image ones because it runs OCR)
3) getting automatic BibTeX reference information from GoogleScholar for each paper and being able to export them later to LaTeX or Word2007.

I am almost done adding to Qiqqa some interesting results from my PhD where Qiqqa will now tell me what it thinks is the most relevant stuff in a new PDF I am reading!

Give it a try and let me know if it helps you out! It's at www.qiqqa.com. And also let me know if you can think of other cool things to add to it!

Ciao,
Jimme

Katie Collins

Member since: August Aug, 2010
23 posts

Katie Collins wrote at 09:43 on 07 September 2010

Hey Jimme,

It looks great, but how does it differ drastically from other document management like GoogleDocs?

Cheers,

Katie

Jimme Jardine

Member since: August Aug, 2010
2 posts

Jimme Jardine wrote at 10:54 on 17 September 2010

Hi Katie,

Qiqqa differes quite a bit from GoogleScholar in that Qiqqa aims more to provide a great tool to help you READ and DIGEST your PDFs. That might including simple tagging, but more importantly, by allowing you to annotate important areas of your PDFs and then quickly and efficiently be able to recap what those areas were using the Annotation Report. Qiqqa also allows you to associate a BibTeX record with each PDF, and to export your library to BibTeX systems or Word2007 so that you don't have to do a lot of manual work when it comes time to writing up.

Cheers,
Jimme

Alemneh

Member since: August Aug, 2010
1 posts

Alemneh wrote at 14:37 on 19 September 2010

Dear all Bart and Kateneva,
Thanks for sharing Zetero and Connotea, These can be a choice for those who can't buy Endnote and Refworks.

Thanks
Alemneh

Katie Collins

Member since: August Aug, 2010
23 posts

Katie Collins wrote at 08:09 on 20 September 2010

Hi Jimme,

Thanks for your reply. It does sound like a useful tool for pdfs but I do worry with new tools about how well supported they are. I see it is still in alpha which I take to mean version 1 and I do like to use more established tools, although I will keep an eye on it.

Stephen Johnston

Member since: August Aug, 2010
25 posts

Stephen Johnston wrote at 11:05 on 04 October 2010

Another good place to find literature is Worldcat which indexes more than 10,000 libraries around the world and also gives you online tools to create reading lists and bibliographies.

http://www.worldcat.org/

I have used this before and it seems to be growing really nicely with a nice easy to use interface - definitely one to try out.

New_reply


Click the stars to rate this topic thread

Very poorPoorAverageGoodVery Good
1star 2star 3star 4star 5star