Get Social

Toolbox on Twitter

Find us on

Follow postgradtoolbox on Twitter Follow Postgraduate Toolbox on Facebook


Sign up to our FREE eNewsletter

Sign up now for the Postgraduate Toolbox fornightly eNewsletter, the ultimate companion to your postgraduate life.

Enter your email here to subscribe.



Banner2

Cps_logo_final2b

Enx5_banner

Minitab_corporate_r__120x49

Linguaphone



Gavin_hadland

Gif1

Pglife_thumb Career_thumb Enterprise_thumb

Advice Forums > Forum: Postgraduate Life >


Transcribing Data- Software recommendation

New_reply

Anna Marie Bonafide

Member since: June Jun, 2008
2 posts

Anna Marie Bonafide wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I am beginning to collect data for my qualitative research for my dissertation. Is there a software program anyone would recommend to assist with the audio to text transcription? Some colleagues suggested Naturally Speaking, but when I spoke to a representative for the software company, the rep. did not recommend the program because of the number of people I will be interviewing and the number of classroom observations with several voices.

Looking forward to hearing from others who may have some suggestions.

Anna Marie

Roy Smalley

Member since: October Oct, 2008
7 posts

Roy Smalley wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I transcribed my own interview data. I would recommend it. Doing the transcription yourself requires focus and concentration to hear what the participant actually said and transcribe it accurately. I haven't found any software, yet, that is capable of transcribing an audio recording of more than one voice. Most speech recognition programs need to be trained to understand a particular voice to get anything above ~80% accuracy.

However, I recently got a copy of Adobe soundbooth which does speech recognition for several voices. After I played around with it I decided not to use it. Initially it is very inaccurate. I couldn't find any information about how to train it to be better. But if you have time then you might like to investigate. However, I think doing your own transcribing or using a transcription service would be faster and more accurate.

Good luck

Anna Marie Bonafide

Member since: June Jun, 2008
2 posts

Anna Marie Bonafide wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

Thanks..this is exactly what I was looking for...a recommendation from someone who had looked into the programs!

Anna Marie

Roy Smalley

Member since: October Oct, 2008
7 posts

Roy Smalley wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

For those who are interested I just found a report of a 'software transcription test' for the Adobe Soundbooth CS4 voice recognition software.

http://www.whitehousetapes.net/info/software-transcription-test-adobe-soundbooth-cs4-white-house-tapes

It is a short concise report of the limitations of the current version of the software.

Simon Quattlebaum

Member since: June Jun, 2008
8 posts

Simon Quattlebaum wrote at 15:27 on 09 May 2010

I concur. Using software to transcribe data is more trouble than its worth. I spoke with my committee chair and she recommended I too disseminate data on my own. Unless the study is over several years, think of working your own transcriptions. In addition, I think the expense of purchasing them is enormous. Save the cash to celebrate when your orals are approved!

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote at 11:54 on 13 May 2010

I have used transcription software previously (Naturally Speaking) but I did not find it very reliable and spending much more time correcting myself than doing the transcription myself first hand. In my current research project,
I have recently run four one hour focus groups but because my project has a very short timescale, I had a very small budget for transcription services. I hadn't used a transcription company before and I no-one could recommend one to me. I briefly looked at reviews on the net and also got a few quotes.

Initially, I choose what I thought was a reasonably priced overseas company who had good claims about accuracy (approx $120 per audio hour). I wanted to try initially with just one file as I did not want to waste money if the quality was not very good. I knew the audio files were good quality despite having multiple speakers. I was so disappointed as the transcription was really poor and the sentences weren't coherent at all. I questioned the company (TranscriptionStar) about whether it had actually been a human rather than software and they said it had but I really didn't believe them given the quality.

I then spent a number of hours correcting the transcription but decided it was actually easier to start from scratch. Given the other research activities which needed to be undertaken, I looked once more at different companies and this time decided to phone a couple based in the UK. I spoke to one lady from Transcription Services (http://www.transcript-services.co.uk) who was great. Her name was Carol; she was very friendly and she immediately filled me with confidence given her numerous years of experience and was also very accommodating given my requirements. She offered to do the first 10 mins of transcription for me to test the quality given the bad experience I had previously had. It was great. Such a remarked difference. With the final transcripts I obviously still had to go through and identify the speakers and correct some of the technical terms but I was going to listening to the audios at least one or two times during the analysis anyway. I also need the transcriptions on a very short timescales and for four hour audio files on a 3 day turn around, I was only charged 80p per audio minute. It would have been cheaper if I'd be able to wait a bit longer. Carol was very accommodating, quick to reply to my queries and provided a value for money service.

Sorry if this sounds like a sales pitch, it isn't but I just wish someone had been able to recommend someone to me then I wouldn't have had this initial bad experience. I do think there are some value for money options out there which if you can get a small research budget for this activity, I allows more time on the most important part: the analysis.

Paul Watts

Member since: July Jul, 2010
1 posts

Paul Watts wrote at 18:10 on 31 July 2010

I know this thread is rather old now, but I am new here and figured I would add my two cents in the hope it might help someone.

I use an Infinity USB footpedal (about £50 from Amazon) with Express Scribe by NCH (which is free) which allows the footpedal to play back the digitally recorded interview whilst typing into a document. I am not a good typist, but the footpedal makes all the difference and by the end of the day I have the interview transcribed with a minimum of outlay.

The main problem I have found with software that aims to help transcribe, is that when dealing with more than one interviewee such as in a focus group, it becomes very confused. DIY seems to work best in this instance and the combination I use has worked adequately for me so far (final year Ed.D)

Paul

Victoria Hickman

Member since: May May, 2008
1 posts

Victoria Hickman wrote at 17:34 on 05 August 2010

I'd recommend outsourcing transcription! I had my transcription (and some translation) done for me in India. My interviews were conducted in India anyway, but I found a great transcription company in Pune that I would highly recommend. They offer a very efficient and reliable service with an ftp server to make everything quick and easy. I was also able to pay in pounds as the company has a UK bank account. I negotiated a rate per hour of recording, and it was very reasonable (less than £10 per hour). They do normally specialise in medical transcriptions, but they are happy to take on any job. http://www.outsourcedmtservices.com/ I liaised with the director Hemant Joshi, you can reach him at hjoshee@eth.net Please quote my name if you get in contact with them. I can't promise how they will be for you, but they were great for me and I would recommend their service highly.

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote at 13:54 on 06 August 2010

In my experience outsourced transcription can be a bit hit and miss - so always go on a personal recommendation. Also, if possible, find someone who may have some background in your field as they will be able to figure out some of the harder words.

Debra Joseph

Member since: August Aug, 2010
3 posts

Debra Joseph wrote at 16:08 on 09 August 2010

I think outsourcing the trancription is the best method. I also keep the digital recordings so I can always play them back to refresh my memory. I utilise CAT reporters. They use the court machine and transcribe fairly easily. I pay by digital tape recordings. Each qualitative transcription could be more than 20 pages. I found doing them myself is rich yes but quite tedious and time consuming.

Hope this helps

Hazel Burke

Member since: August Aug, 2010
1 posts

Hazel Burke wrote at 10:47 on 25 August 2010

Dear all
We wrote a "toolkit" about transcribing qualitative data earlier this year, which you might like. It covers things like planning for transcribing, working out how long it will take you (there's a spreadsheet to do this for you), some of the pros and cons of doing it yourself, equipment, software and some tips on ways of working a bit more quickly. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/realities/resources/toolkits/transcribing-your-data/
Good luck!
Hazel

New_reply


Click the stars to rate this topic thread

Very poorPoorAverageGoodVery Good
1star 2star 3star 4star 5star